Soundboard, 9/21/13, about 10 minutes in: http://wtju.net/vault
I just got back from a nine-day book tour covering six North Carolina stores and the Southern Independent Booksellers Alliance conference in New Orleans. I was at Bull’s Head, Regulator, McIntyre’s, Flyleaf, Country Bookshop, and Park Road; then at SIBA I was on a panel with four other writers. It’s always a pleasure and a privilege to go out and talk up what you’ve been working on for the past couple of years. Even more of a treat is that rare chance to connect face-to-face with readers and other writers. At SIBA Susan Gregg Gilmore and I read paragraphs on camera from each other’s books. Later on, after a mass signing event, I went out for drinks and dinner with other admired fellow writers—Michael Parker, Drew Perry, and Jamie Poissant.
Hanging out with writers is the icing; the cake is the chance to meet booksellers and readers and to talk about everything from work habits to research to my sheriff grandmother. What I especially like is the Q&A time, when I get to hear what my readers and potential readers are interested in. I love the back-and-forth that often comes from a question, whether it’s one I’ve entertained many times or something completely new.
As a writer with a background in journalism, I’ve had to adjust to talking about my work instead of asking questions. But the wonderful thing about book audiences is that we all share a love of reading. So before they even come up to have their book signed I know we are members of the same club, because I know that for us few experiences can compare with spending a dozen or so hours alone in a great story.
I’ll be going out again in a couple of weeks, hitting eight more cities and two festivals. By the end I’ll be looking forward to getting back to my writing routine—it’s a common feeling among writers on tour. But I also know that the time away is a good refresher in itself, and book tour in particular is invaluable for those connections, those reminders that we’re not writing for ourselves but for all kinds of people, all of us on the lookout for another good book.
The Page 69 Test: http://page69test.blogspot.com/2013/09/love-and-lament.html
A writer who wants to write about family goes up against many of the same problems as any writer of historical fiction. Of course, sometimes the two overlap, as in Love and Lament, a historical novel with origins in family lore. The question in either case is how much do we draw from real life and how much do we invent. There’s no simple formula; every writer makes his or her own way through the story. What is specific, though, to family-based fiction is that nagging doubt about creating characters and scenes that are either uncomfortably close to reality or might be judged “inaccurate.” Fiction about historical figures can run the same risk, only the critics are not generally family members.
So, at what point do we say that the demands of art, for some particular story, require that we move on through that intersection of nonfiction and fiction, feeling all the while like grave robbers, indecent, but still obsessed with unearthing something from the past that no one but us could ever find, something beautiful and true that we can brush off and give to the world (or at least a few readers) and say, here, take a look at this—isn’t it amazing?
I wish I had an answer. I think we have to trust that when we’re on to something rich in the fictional world, when we’re mining a vein, then it’s not only okay, it’s required of us as serious writers that we at least pursue it where it leads us and see if we can find in it something good and true, something worth giving to other people. If we’re only gossiping or presenting lurid details simply to shock and scandalize—in other words, to call attention to ourselves—we might reconsider our material. But if we’re using the material with care, trying to create characters with the dignity and depth they deserve, then we should be grateful for what we’ve been given.
I launched my second novel, Love and Lament, yesterday at Richmond’s Fountain Bookstore, the same place I launched my debut effort two years ago. Or, rather, Fountain did the launching, and I was the lucky beneficiary. In the past two years it has become more and more clear to me what a risky, labor-of-love adventure running an independent bookstore is. And what an act of defiance, against the odds, against trends. Proprietor Kelly Justice and her staff have created a cultural hub, the flowering, literary center of Virginia’s capital. It seems to me that every indie bookstore has its own character: Fountain has a funky, Shockoe Bottom charm, and Kelly is one of the sweetest, coolest booksellers I know. I’ve told her I could easily imagine local writers from times past stopping by on a regular basis. Edgar Allan Poe would’ve lurked outside, finally making up his mind to come in (after arguing brilliantly with himself, and perhaps saucy blogger Rebecca Schinsky going out and hooking her arm in his). Once inside, he’d mainly want to know how his own sales were going, and he’d leave with an armload of books that he could skewer in the pages of the Southern Literary Messenger. Thomas Nelson Page would drop by in some dapper outfit, removing his hat with a gallant bow to the ladies. And Ellen Glasgow would share the latest gossip about the neighbors.
We need these bookstores, because they’re more than quaint giftshops. Books give meaning and shape to our lives; they entertain and educate us like nothing else. And bookshops, with their experts and events and local individuality, create a community of committed book-lovers. It’s wonderfully heartening to know that there has been a recent uptick in indie business.
Inspired by true events, my new novel is an old-fashioned Southern family drama with lots of Sturm und Drang. It’s quite different from my first, a historical crime story, but in both cases, Kelly and Fountain were among the earliest, most vocal champions, and I’ll always be thankful.
For years I often struggled with modern settings, but when I turned to historical fiction an interesting thing happened. Only when I began writing about the past could I treat my characters with real respect, could I get rid of a certain ironic curl of the lip, an actual physical tic that sometimes accompanied my putting words on the page. I was freed from the pressing need for cynicism and mockery. It’s hard to make fun of the dead. There’s plenty of humor to be found in times past, but characters called up as it were from the grave don’t invite mockery the way contemporary ones do.
In The Reservoir (my first novel) I spent months on the trail of a true story, thinking I might turn it into a nonfiction book. Failing to find enough detailed material, I turned to fiction, and the world of the story began to open up in the most liberating of ways. By that point, I had enough experience in both research and writing to give it a try, though I’ll admit that at first it seemed overwhelming. I’d never pictured myself writing historical fiction, but I was intrigued. My job, as I saw it, was to re-light a fire that had gone cold more than a century ago and make it burn brighter than ever. With Love and Lament, the challenge was altogether different—to make a fire from nothing but a handful of kindling, a few family anecdotes.
What became illuminated for me was a character named Mary Bet, a young woman who is always trying to find her better self, stumbling sometimes, but striving to do right, and the drama comes in seeing her struggle and seeing how she handles the blows that a hard life inflicts. I think we measure ourselves against our predecessors. When we know something of their lives, we wonder how we might’ve done, and almost always what they did seems bigger, harder, on a grander stage: “What they dreamed, we live, and what they lived, we dream.”
I recently saw a production of La Bohéme at Charlottesville’s Ashlawn Festival, and realized something I hadn’t before. That odd juxtaposition of the sublime and the ridiculous in much of opera—gorgeous music soaring over some trivial business—is often intentional. I’d always considered it a weakness of opera, and probably sometimes it is. But, for example, when Mimi observes how Musette lives a lie—a profound observation—while, at the same time, Musette makes flippant remarks about her sex appeal, the ensemble (some of the greatest music ever written) underscores that tragicomic nexus where our feet of clay always trip us up, even while we reach for the highest heaven of invention or nature.
We can find that nexus of the mundane and the profound in any good fiction; I’ve just been looking for it lately in the past.
I forget what author said that writers have less insight than anybody about their own books. At the risk of not knowing what I’m talking about when I’m talking about my own writing, I’ll share a few thoughts about the milieu of Love and Lament.
The heroine, Mary Bet, was of a gentry that had gone to war and come home defeated, heads hung low in shame and bitterness and exhaustion. The land was empty; fortunes were gone up in smoke. Despite generous surrender terms offered by the North, it was still an occupied territory. But by the 1890s things were beginning to change. Mary Bet’s story takes place between this time and the first world war.
We tend to believe that there’s something simple and romantic in the pre-world-war era, and it’s true that people’s lives then were very different from ours. The pace of life was not as jittery, nor as instantaneous. Life expectancy was lower, resulting in outlooks and expectations that were not so unbounded. The story of your life, particularly in the South, was contained within the few square miles of a county. Most people lived rural lives—only about 15 percent of Southerners lived in a town in 1900 (the situation has now reversed, with an urban population of 85 percent). The expectation was that you’d be born, get married, grow old, die, and be buried in the churchyard beside other family members. To want more was to be considered proud, arrogant, “uppity.” Everybody had his place, and to act out of it was to upset a very carefully established social order and thus invite chaos.
Communities were smaller, quieter, and more obvious, mostly revolving around church and civic functions, and there was a clearer line between classes, especially between blacks and whites. Race relations were, by the 1890s, back on an even keel, owing to sporadic terrorism and the black codes of the Jim Crow South, and blacks took up their former subservient position and waited for a better day. Meanwhile, a war was coming in Europe, a war with no clear cause, enemy, or purpose.
But people also had the same pressing concerns of family and love and work and fulfillment as we do. And, for the Hartsoe family, those concerns came down to a matter of survival. In the 1890s, modern medicine was in its infancy; germ theory was taking its first steps. It was an era of fluxes, fevers, and midnight miasmas. The idea that there were microorganisms that could enter the body and do damage was just beginning to be accepted. In the meantime, if you contracted an infectious disease and your body’s immune system was not able to beat it, you had no choice but to suffer and die. People didn’t expect public health miracles on a regular basis, and they didn’t get them. The vaccine for typhoid—a deadly, contagious killer—did not appear until 1917. It took ten more years for tetanus. And not until the 1940s would the first sulfa drugs become available, and the war on infectious diseases could begin in earnest.
The modernization of America got seriously underway after World War I, and by then everything had changed. For Mary Bet and her family, those changes would come too late.